Microneedling vs Venus Viva Resurfacing
When it comes to enhancing your skin’s appearance, we want to choose something that is effective and results driven. Two great options are available at Whole Health and here’s what you should know.
Microneedling and Venus Viva resurfacing are both skin treatments used to improve skin texture, reduce signs of aging, and treat scars. However, they work in different ways and are suitable for different skin concerns. Here’s a comparison of the two treatments:
Microneedling
Microneedling involves using fine needles to create tiny punctures in the skin. This triggers the body’s natural healing process, encouraging the production of collagen and elastin, leading to smoother, firmer skin.
How it works:
Small needles create micro-injuries in the skin’s surface.
This stimulates collagen production.
It can be done with or without radio-frequency (RF) for additional skin tightening.
Benefits:
Reduces fine lines and wrinkles
Improves skin texture and tone
Minimizes acne scars and hyperpigmentation
Minimal downtime (1-3 days of redness)
suitable for most skin types
Drawbacks:
May require multiple treatments for optimal results
Redness, swelling, and peeling are common post treatment effects
Risk of infection if not done in a sterile environment
2. Venus Viva Resurfacing
Venus Viva is a non-invasive treatment that combines NanoFractional Radio Frequency (RF) and SmartScan technology to deliver heat energy deep into the skin. This energy stimulates collagen production, while also resurfacing the other skin layer to improve texture and reduce imperfections.
How it works:
Radio-frequency energy is delivered through tiny pins that penetrate the skin’s surface.
The heat promotes collagen remodelling and skin renewal.
It targets deeper layers of the skin compared to traditional microneedling.
Benefits:
Effective for deeper wrinkles, scars, and more significant skin texture issues.
Treats acne scars, enlarged pores, stretch marks, and hyperpigmentation.
Safe for all skin types and tones.
Minimal downtime (redness for 1-2 days).
Fewer treatments are typically required than with traditional microneedling.
Drawbacks:
Higher cost compared to microneedling.
May cause more discomfort during the procedure.
Possible temporary side effects like swelling, redness, and dryness.
Key Differences:
Depth of treatment: Venus Viva penetrates deeper into the skin layers compared to microneedling, making it more effective for signifiant scars or deeper wrinkles.
Technology: Microneedling is mechanical, while Venus Viva uses radio-frequency combined with heat energy.
Downtime: Both have relatively short downtime, but Venus Viva may lead to a slightly longer recovery in some cases.
Number of treatments: Microneedling often requires more sessions to achieve similar results to what Venus Viva can provide in fewer sessions.
Choosing Between the Two:
Microneedling is ideal if you are looking for a gentler, more affordable option for mild to moderate skin concerns like fine lines or mild acne scars.
Venus Viva is a better option for those seeking to address deeper wrinkles, significant acne scarring, or more advanced skin texture issues, and who are willing to invest in a higher-cost treatment with fewer sessions.
Ultimately, the best treatment depends on your specific skin concerns, your tolerance for downtime, and your budget. A consultation is always complimentary and a great way to have your skin accurately assess and all of your questions answered.